CAP Guidelines for MMR and MSI Testing

Despite FDA approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, such as pembrolizumab, for patients that exhibit DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H), guidance is lacking on which clinical assays should be used to assess mismatch repair defects. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) convened an expert panel to develop such clinical assay recommendations. Methods that were considered included immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for MSI analysis, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for MSI analysis, and NGS for tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a surrogate for MMR status.

Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Guideline from the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration with the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer. Bartley, Angela N., et al.

number-one-icon-circle

Recommendation 1:
Colorectal cancer (CRC)

For patients with CRC being considered for ICI, pathologists should use MMR-IHC and/or MSI-PCR for the detection of DNA mismatch repair defects. Although MMR-IHC or MSI-PCR are preferred, pathologists may use a validated MSI-NGS assay for detection of mismatch repair defects.

number-two-icon-circle

Recommendation 2:
Gastroesophageal (GEA) and small bowel cancer

For patients with GEA and small bowel cancer being considered for ICI therapy, pathologists should use MMR-IHC and/or MSI-PCR over MSI-NGS for the detection of mismatch repair defects.

Number three

Recommendation 3:
Endometrial cancer

For patients with endometrial cancer being considered for ICI therapy, pathologists should use MMR-IHC over MSI-PCR or MSI-NGS for the detection of mismatch repair defects.

Number four

Recommendation 4:
Other cancers

For patients with cancer types other than CRC, GEA, small bowel, and endometrial being considered for ICI therapy, pathologists should test for mismatch repair defects, although the optimal approach has not been established.

Number five

Recommendation 5: Using TMB as surrogate for mismatch repair defects

For all cancer patients being considered for ICI therapy based on mismatch repair defects, pathologists should not use TMB as a surrogate for detection of mismatch repair defects.

Number six

Recommendation 6: dMMR and Lynch syndrome

For cancer patients being considered for ICI therapy, if dMMR consistent with Lynch syndrome is identified, pathologists should communicate this finding to the treating physician.

Caris Comprehensive Profiling Enables Adherence to CAP Recommendations

Comprehensive molecular profiling from Caris Life Sciences® assesses DNA, RNA and proteins with multiple technologies (NGS DNA-WES & RNA-WTS, PyroSeq, IHC, ISH) to reveal a more complete molecular blueprint to help guide physicians with more individualized treatment decisions and provide the best care.

DNA icon

DNA

Whole Exome Sequencing
SNVs, Indels, CNAs & Karyotyping

RNA icon

RNA

Whole Transcriptome Sequencing
Gene Fusions, Variant Transcripts & Gene Expression

Protein icon

Protein

Immunohistochemistry
Tumor-Expressed Antigens

Caris Comprehensive Profiling Meets CAP Recommendations

By performing whole exome sequencing (WES), whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) and IHC Analysis, Caris Life Sciences’ comprehensive profiling addresses the recommendations from the CAP guidelines.

CAP Recommendations 1 Related Caris Testing
1. For CRC patients being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, pathologists should use MMR-IHC and/or MSIPCR (or a validated MSI-NGS) to detect mismatch repair defects. Caris offers analysis of MMR by IHC and by MSI-NGS, which has been validated against PCR for equivalency.2
2. For gastroesophageal or small bowel cancer patients being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, pathologists should use MMR-IHC and/or MSI-PCR for detection of mismatch repair defects.
3. For endometrial cancer patients being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, pathologists should use MMR-IHC over MSI-PCR or MSI-NGS.
4. For other cancer patients being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, pathologists should test for mismatch repair defects but the optimal approach has not been established.
5. For all cancer patients being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, pathologists should NOT use TMB as a surrogate for the detection of mismatch repair defects. Caris reports TMB as an independent biomarker, not as a surrogate for MMR/MSI. Caris offers analysis of MMR by IHC and by MSI-NGS, which has been validated against PCR for equivalency.2
6. For cancer patients being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, if a dMMR consistent with Lynch syndrome is identified, pathologists should communicate this to the physician. Caris’ comprehensive approach analyzes both protein expression and gene mutations, and the Caris report calls out mutations potentially associated with Lynch syndrome.
  1. Angela N. Bartley, Anne M. Mills, Eric Konnick, Michael Overman, Christina B. Ventura, Lesley Souter, Carol Colasacco, Zsofia K. Stadler, Sarah Kerr, Brooke E. Howitt, Heather Hampel, Sarah F. Adams, Wenora Johnson, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Antonia R. Sepulveda, and Russell R. Broaddus. “Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.” Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2022)
  2. Ari Vanderwalde, David Spetzler, Nianqing Xiao, Zoran Gatalica, and John Marshall. “Microsatellite instability status determined by next-generation sequencing and compared with PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden in 11,348 patients”. Cancer Med. (2018)

Other Important Mismatch Repair Defect Assay Factors

The expert panel suggested an overall preference for mismatch repair defect detection using IHC, stating that IHC has the advantage of identifying the most probable gene defect as compared to MSI testing. The panel concluded that while MMRIHC, MSI-PCR and MSI-NGS have comparable performance metrics, any preference for MSI-PCR over MSI-NGS was due to reduced tissue requirements and turnaround times specifically for mismatch repair defect analysis. The panel also acknowledged the wider benefits of an NGS approach, which was beyond the scope of the current expert panel recommendations. Caris’ comprehensive molecular profiling provides potentially far more actionable results than just guidance on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, analyzing all DNA/RNA alterations and molecular signatures by NGS, plus 15+ proteins by IHC, providing a complete molecular picture to help guide physicians with treatment decisions and provide the best care.

Caris Molecular Profiling Menu

international-caris-sm-ol-co.svg

International & US

Review and download the Caris molecular profiling testing menu for US and International cases.
new-york-caris-sm-ol-co.svg

New York

Review and download the Caris molecular profiling testing menu for New York state cases.
europe-caris-sm-ol-co.svg

Europe

Review and download the Caris molecular profiling testing menu for European cases.